No, I had $2000 set to 0, but I just re-ran it with $2000 set to $04 and I get the exact same result. So the increment mode has no effect.James wrote:I'm assuming that, in your test, 2000.2 is set (i.e. address increment = 32). In that case, any read of $2007 would clock FV (bits 12-13), toggling 0x1000, no?
No, since the tests use the same timing for both. I've seen a few entires different from one run to the next, but nothing widespread.Do you think the +1 increment relative to dummy, in most of the reads, is simply a timing difference?