It is currently Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:10 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 8:19 pm
Posts: 89
If true this is pretty hilarious/hypocritical. Ines header shows up in the super mario downloaded file via wii.


https://youtu.be/zR1uEwjx7VI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline
Formerly WheelInventor

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 2:55 am
Posts: 907
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
It's also plausible Nintendo has just adopted the Ines standard because it makes sense

_________________
http://www.frankengraphics.com - personal NES blog


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:28 pm
Posts: 3192
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
The .NES file format (specifically, it's a 16-byte header) is public, invented by Marat Fayzullin, as the video discusses. Anything (commercial or open-source) can use the format; it's essentially public domain.

There is absolutely no way to prove in a court of law that Nintendo "downloaded a ROM from the Internet" and used it in their product. They may have dumped a cartridge themselves, or used a .bin they had laying around (we know for a fact they have an archive of all their game development details, which certainly includes source code) and stuck a .NES header on the front of it (maybe for ease of use of testing).

Marat's speculative statement, re: the head being detached from the body, is certainly a valid point (the bigger the company, the more likely this happens), but again, you can't just assume that's the case -- you have to prove it, and there's no actual way to prove it in this case.

If you think Nintendo doesn't run tons of their processes (esp. commercial release) through their Legal team for verification that everything was done by the book, you'd be kidding yourself. In other words: if they did use a ROM they found off the Internet, Legal knows the above, thus they're in the clear either way. They're not exactly a "stupid" company given their size and stature.

Hence, I don't see how this is hilarious or hypocritical.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Posts: 19113
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
It's been known for a while that Virtual Console uses the iNES container invented by the warez scene. It's just as likely that Nintendo dumped an authentic Super Mario Bros. Game Pak and then wrapped it in an iNES header the same way anyone else would.

When I clicked the video, I heard "Did you know that the ROM matches", until I realized that it was "Did you know that the wrong mattress" from a 3 minute and 41 second advertisement for Purple Mattress Protector, which keeps pausing on its own when it fails to start. I know you didn't intentionally rickroll me because the video title is "Did Nintendo download a Mario ROM and sell it back to us? - Here's A Thing", but I've been noticing that somehow my Firefox browser is having a hard time loading some YouTube ads lately. It depends more on the ad than on the video it's connected to: some ads consistently load on the first or second try, whereas other ads consistently take half a dozen clicks or more on the Play icon in the middle of the ad's poster image. Is Google trying to drive users toward YouTube Red by reducing the reliability of its ad-supported service?


Attachments:
ad loading.gif
ad loading.gif [ 139.24 KiB | Viewed 1523 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 5:49 am
Posts: 804
Location: Sweden
I guess that if one of the Virtual Console games have "Disk Dude" in the header it could be a somewhat likely proof that it was downloaded. But since Nintendo are the copyright holders of these games I don't see how downloading would be illegal for them?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 7:36 pm
Posts: 143
The legality of Nintendo downloading and reselling their own ROM seems like a minor concern and lesser point to me, and unfortunately it's ultimately a distraction.

Nintendo was prompted by, and somewhat leveraged, the existing emulation scene, turning it into a source of profit. Even that isn't wrong. The hypocrisy is that they had previously and continue to portray ("unauthorized") emulation as wholly illegitimate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 3943
On the other hand, if it was the Bad Dump of Super Mario Bros that starts you at 0-1, that would be a complete other can of worms.

_________________
Here come the fortune cookies! Here come the fortune cookies! They're wearing paper hats!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 3:04 pm
Posts: 936
Again?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 3943
It hit social media again so here it is.

_________________
Here come the fortune cookies! Here come the fortune cookies! They're wearing paper hats!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 5728
Location: Canada
Frank Cifaldi said it as a joke to make a point. This guy doesn't seem to fully understand the joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 5728
Location: Canada
I found the article this is based on: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017- ... back-to-us

I think this is really just a critical misinterpretation of the letter from Marat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 12:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 5:49 am
Posts: 804
Location: Sweden
I see, "There are minute differences between ROM dumps" no way! If they dumped the same mask ROMs correctly and added the header properly the file should be identical right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 2:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 1402
tepples wrote:
I've been noticing that somehow my Firefox browser is having a hard time loading some YouTube ads lately. It depends more on the ad than on the video it's connected to: some ads consistently load on the first or second try, whereas other ads consistently take half a dozen clicks or more on the Play icon in the middle of the ad's poster image. Is Google trying to drive users toward YouTube Red by reducing the reliability of its ad-supported service?

AdBlock Plus and you don't need to bother with this anymore.

_________________
Available now: My game "City Trouble".
Website: https://megacatstudios.com/products/city-trouble
Trailer: https://youtu.be/IYXpP59qSxA
Gameplay: https://youtu.be/Eee0yurkIW4
German Retro Gamer article: http://i67.tinypic.com/345o108.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 2:49 pm
Posts: 7232
Location: Chexbres, VD, Switzerland
koitsu wrote:
There is absolutely no way to prove in a court of law that Nintendo "downloaded a ROM from the Internet" and used it in their product. They may have dumped a cartridge themselves [...] and stuck a .NES header on the front of it (maybe for ease of use of testing).

Sure, but I think it's 90% safe to say they downloaded a ROM. If they didn't then they added the iNES header themselves, and they had to download doccuments from what they consider illegitimate pirates in order to have information about how the iNES header works, so it's just as ironic/pathetic in my opinion.

Quote:
(we know for a fact they have an archive of all their game development details, which certainly includes source code)

Source please ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:20 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Posts: 10065
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
I find it pretty ironic that Nintendo resorted to using a pirate file format in official releases, regardless of whether the ROM image itself comes from the web or their own archives. If I had to guess, I'd say this is because the emulator they use wasn't created in house from the ground up, but was instead based on something that already used iNES files.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group