It is currently Sun Aug 19, 2018 4:20 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:28 pm
Posts: 3482
Location: Mountain View, CA
If you're going to be doing changes to commercial games (e.g. romhacking), use an IPS patch (or similar binary patching methodology). Do not upload ROM images directly:

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2018/07/ ... ere-suing/
https://games.slashdot.org/story/18/07/ ... were-suing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:58 am
Posts: 795
Location: -29.794229 -55.795374
Is it me or is Nintendo trying to generate bigger demand for retro consoles?
Would this be a new business model, since they're facing a huge competition on creating new and successful games?
Maybe they are thinking in repackage and sell "new old stuff", since it's easier than create new ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:28 pm
Posts: 3482
Location: Mountain View, CA
My post was not to debate or pontificate upon Nintendo's legal or marketing decisions.

It was meant to say: "folks who visit here: be aware of the rules on this site/sites. Failure to follow these rules can get the site/sites shut down. See example. Whether it's wrong or right doesn't matter."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 6600
Location: Canada
Have people been posting ROMs here? Like, I've seen it happen once in a blue moon, but it always gets corrected quickly...?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 9:58 am
Posts: 795
Location: -29.794229 -55.795374
I've posted a couple in the past, mostly pirate games dumps, but I quickly removed and posted an ips file instead.
Should I be worried?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:28 pm
Posts: 3482
Location: Mountain View, CA
It's just a reminder for people. I was hoping someone would pin the thread. There has already been discussion over "what are the rules now that we're not on Parodius Networking", and as such, reminding folks of at least a base rule (esp. considering Nintendo's recent actions) would seem wise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 6600
Location: Canada
The one thing I've been worried about in this respect is the NSF rips thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:28 pm
Posts: 3482
Location: Mountain View, CA
Yup, I'm concerned about the same thing. The NSF aspect may actually warrant the need to discuss with an actual IP/DMCA attorney. Tricky subject, I think, considering they're "partial" extractions (certainly containing original playerback code, sequenced data, and (if applicable) PCM samples)... but they're not "an entire ROM" in the literal sense.

Bare minimum: Nintendo seems to be going after stuff they themselves produced, so NSFs of official Nintendo titles might be worth pulling, if there are any.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 6600
Location: Canada
Ha ha, that's a funny thought... because of the nature of that thread almost everything in it is very obscure. Most Nintendo brand NSFs got ripped a long time prior. :P (There's definitely some Nintendo stuff in there, though.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Posts: 10714
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Even if there was zero code or music data from the actual game ROMs (e.g. it was all mp3 recordings), just the melodies themselves are someone's intellectual property and distributing them would probably already be condidered copyright infringement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 6600
Location: Canada
NSF rips are 100% a copyright infringement either way, I don't think there's much to argue about that.

The harder question is how much risk is involved in having them hosted on this forum, and to whom that risk belongs. It's been really weird to me that IP owners don't seem to police NSFs, VGM rips, etc. but as someone who enjoys and benefits from their presence I'm glad it's been this way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:38 pm
Posts: 1750
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
My guess is that nsf is such an obscure format that it's never was on their radar (yet). If you talks about sharing a "rom" and mp3 or avi/mp4 (etc) then it will surely gets theirs attention but nsf/vgm? Not many people would know about that.

But yes, now that Nintendo (America branch only?) seems sensitive, this is worrisome, a little bit. Up to know I'm not aware of them sending legal actions for nsf files but hmmm...

Man I hate those things. It's not like distributing a game or something, you just want to listen to some game music.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Posts: 20420
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
Nintendo has in the past sold CD copies of the soundtrack of Super Mario 64 and other first-party games. So if we see the company publishing its back catalog's soundtracks en masse on Amazon Music, iTunes Store/Apple Music, and Google Play Music, then we get worried.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:48 pm
Posts: 564
Why not just have a publically known onion for all NES/Famicom ROMs and NSFs without distinguishable ownership?

A reliable repository of commercial material is always necessary for accurate emulation and historic preservation.

The hash for the v2 or v3 onion can be changed time to time and simply advertised in someone's signature or in other subversive manners.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:21 pm
Posts: 446
Location: Central Illinois, USA
B00daW wrote:
Why not just have a publically known onion for all NES/Famicom ROMs and NSFs without distinguishable ownership?


I think this is the wrong place to even discuss trying to solve that problem. Somebody else that's into ROM preservation can tackle that. My understanding is that here we stay legal by avoiding it entirely.

_________________
My games: http://www.bitethechili.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FrankenGraphics and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group