It is currently Tue Sep 26, 2017 5:36 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 918
Using a different loop point for different tracks can sometimes be useful for such thing as ostinato, but I am not sure how useful it is to use a different tempo per tracks (although maybe some people do find it useful; I have seen sheet music that has multiple time signatures running simultaneously, although I am not sure what good that is). And it is true that things such as echo are easier with MML.

(Many of the advantages of using MML are why I wrote AmigaMML, since some game engines for modern computers, and some other programs, expect .MOD/.XM formats for music. AmigaMML does support different local loops per channels (all such loops are automatically unrolled), but does not support differing global loops per channel due to limitations in .MOD/.XM formats.)

_________________
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 5:49 am
Posts: 757
Location: Sweden
Although separate tempo tracks could be used for BGSes a similar thing could be achieved if the sound engine allows multiple songs to be played at the same time. One BGM and one BGS.

thefox wrote:
rainwarrior wrote:
The lack of immediate feedback is a huge disadvantage compared to Famitracker. Being able to hear a sound right away, and hear it in context of the rest of the music as you're working is so important. It speeds up composing tremendously (i.e. you make better music in less time). This is the single reason I don't really use MML unless I have to.

I always wondered how well something like this could be worked into a text editor specifically customized for use with (a specific variant of) MML.

There's 3ML Editor that allows for immediate playback of the MML from a position you choose. 3ML Editor is for Mabinogi MML.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 5655
Location: Canada
Bregalad wrote:
Also, if you want say a channel to echo another channel (play the same melody with a delay), with MML it's trivial, but with a tracker... welcome to hell.

Neil Baldwin's NTRQ NES tracker had a feature to do just that (called "auto echo").

In Famitracker, it involves a copy and paste for every pattern the effect spans. I wouldn't call it "hell", but sure, it's not automated in any way. I've done it hundreds of times in various trackers though (and so have a lot of people I know), doesn't generally take a significant amount of time if you know the relevant keyboard commands.

If the concern is data size, it's a feature that could be added to any music engine. Doesn't really have to do with whether it's from a tracker or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group