koitsu wrote:Be careful what you wish for.
You're saying they can't match F-Zero GX?
Kannagi wrote:This is not a SNES dev forum ?
Oh, I'm an idiot... Because this is the forum I comment on the most, I often just type "SNESDEV" into Google and follow the link. I wasn't thinking.
Pokun wrote:Only Joy-Con R has the Motion IR Camera
Yeah, that's what I meant. I don't think the lack of Amiibo sensor on the other controller is any big deal though. You normally use those in a non gameplay setting where you can wait to take turns with the sensor. I doubt the Motion IR Camera will be used much if at all, so it doesn't really matter, but if you're going to do it at all, you might as well go all the way. I just realized that I don't think this thing will have a camera, but the cameras that Nintendo puts in their devices have always been or really bad quality anyway.
Pokun wrote:I agree with Espozo that it's time for another F-Zero that can compete with F-Zero X
You mean F-Zero GX? There were the two Gameboy Advance games after F-Zero GX, but I don't count those for a couple reasons. (Whoever though turning a game into a TV show and back into a game is an idiot, not that this type of thing hasn't been done before though.)
93143 wrote:Even if there were an F-Zero game well along in development, showing it now would cannibalize Fast RMX, which is no way to treat Shin'en.
Survival of the fittest! The main reaction to Fast Racing Neo seemed to be "It's not F-Zero, but it will do for now."
93143 wrote:the contortions you had to engage in to come up with an analogy to describe Arms speaks volumes
I wouldn't have an anti-ARMS bias if they didn't drag out the presentation of the game for 5 minutes. They totally overestimated how much people would care about that game, and I don't think the people who care about 1 2 Switch or ARMS would wait to watch a one hour livestream.
93143 wrote:EDIT: I decline to give any further opinion of either game at this point. Insufficient data.
I think Nintendo took care of that with ARMS...
93143 wrote:The bit where they had a couple of developers come out and say they were working on stuff, and then not show anything, did fall kinda flat IMO...
The translator made it worth it.
93143 wrote:they can take that phone integration and shove it.
If it truly was like a phone (play over LTE) that would be badass.
Zepper wrote:?Hardware? What's the hardware specs? What are you buying!?
I don't think they want you to know. (You can figure that out...

)
Zepper wrote:Super Mario universe... in a CITY!? No fantasy-style like in Super Mario Sunshine, at least!? No. A coincidence with that Mario demos using the Unreal engine?
I immediately thought of Sonic Adventure. It's not
quite as ridiculous as that...
Pokun wrote:Yeah let's hope that Nintendo have plans. I'm all for new franchises but I'd like to see old established franchises that I grew up with continue to thrive as well.
They have so many they left for the dump. Too bad they botched Star Fox.
Pokun wrote:Interesting enough there's a sign in the Mario Odyssey trailer that says "New Donk City" and a street sign saying "Dixie ST", so that's Donkey Kong references allright.
That was awesome. I think I heard there was an Expresso and Winky street too (unless people are pulling my leg.)