It is currently Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:49 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 6:12 pm
Posts: 2295
If there's any movie marketing gimmick I'm tired of seeing it's CinemaScope. It's stupid and distracting, everything looks tiny, and that extra room on the sides of the screen is always wasted on showing walls, and it always feels like vertical detail gets cut off. Seeing a tall castle is nowhere near as impressive if they don't show all of it without making it seem like it's very far away.

DVDs are even worse. So many DVD movies get altered to fit into extra wide aspect ratios they were never intended to be in. Cut off more vertical picture, or make everybody fat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 5:20 pm
Posts: 294
Location: Colorado USA
Yes, I agree. I guess it would be kind of cool in movie theaters, but it's still utterly pointless anyway because most of the time, people focus their attention on the main characters that have importance to the scene. I mean, who honestly has a CinemaScope TV anyway? When I watch a CinemaScope TV at best-buy, I can never tell the difference between that and a normal flat TV. Why make DVDs with cinemascope? for most people, all it does is add black bars on the top and bottom of their screen because like I said earlier, almost nobody has a cinemascope TV.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 6:12 pm
Posts: 2295
I miss playing VHS on CRTs where everything was fullscreen. Blu-rays are good too because they're made specifically for HDTVs, but I don't have a Blu-ray player.

DVDs are a pain in the butt having to constantly fiddle with the remote to make the picture fit. It's a shame that most DVDs end up having a worse vertical resolution than standard definition TV.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 8:43 pm
Posts: 1306
What are you trying to refer to when you say "Cinemascope"? The ancient capturing/projection method to get anamorphic widescreen content on a little square piece of film? Or are you just referring to "ultra-wide" TVs, or curved ones? Or 2:39:1 aspect ratio?

Full-screen VHS movies were almost always pan-and-scan croppings of the original print. It's nice to fill a screen, but I don't miss that practice at the expense of parts of the original shot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:12 am
Posts: 6297
Location: Seattle
(wikipedia seems to think that the CinemaScope trademark was only used in the 1950s. I have no idea what the current trade name is for ultra-wide-screen formats)

VHS was low enough resolution that pan-and-scan probably was worth it. DVDs, on the other hand ... probably not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 6:12 pm
Posts: 2295
The interlacing is way more noticeable. You only have about 136 lines per field.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:10 am
Posts: 578
Location: Estonia, Rapla city (50 and 60Hz compatible :P)
ok, so it means non anamorphic widescreen.

_________________
http://www.tmeeco.eu


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:34 am 
Online

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Posts: 19116
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
Anamorphic scope is about 180 lines per NTSC field, same as non-anamorphic widescreen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:10 am
Posts: 578
Location: Estonia, Rapla city (50 and 60Hz compatible :P)
Then I'm confused. Over here pretty much all TVs have means to reduce scan height (either via SCART 4:3/16:9 signal, info in Cvideo and via manual aspect ratio control), and what is referred to as anamorphic widescreen content over here uses up all the lines in video signal without wasting any on the black bars that way. Some TVs can do the reverse too, increase scan height to make bordered image fill the screen (function I sometimes needed during transitioning to digital broadcast when 4:3 and widescreen signalling wasn't quite consistent yet).

_________________
http://www.tmeeco.eu


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:12 am
Posts: 6297
Location: Seattle
non-anamorphic 2.4:1 that's been letterboxed to 4:3 NTSC should be 124 scanlines per field, AFAICT?

I mean, 224 ×4÷3 = 298; 298÷2.4 = 124.

180 scanlines per field on 4:3 NTSC would be 16:9 (298÷180) .... so if the source material is 12:5 and it's not anamorphic and it's taking 180 scanlines per field, that has to be cropped from the 12:5 master... unless I'm missing something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:38 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Posts: 19116
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
180 lines on 16:9 NTSC would be 64:27, or 2.37:1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:12 am
Posts: 6297
Location: Seattle
16:9 NTSC is anamorphic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:21 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Posts: 19116
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
Which is why scope DAR isn't quite as much of a problem in the DVD era, when monitors are expected to offer an anamorphic mode, than it was in the VHS era, which was practically all 4:3 all the time.

But I wouldn't recommend making an NES game in scope DAR. Super NES maybe, but only in mode 5 or interlaced 7. In mode 5, at least, you at least get 512x256 pixels.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 6:12 pm
Posts: 2295
Why aren't anamorphic DVDs more popular? All the DVDs I can find have thick black bars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I hate CinemaScope
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:12 am
Posts: 6297
Location: Seattle
That should be a confiugration option in your DVD player...

All the widescreen DVDs that I have are 720x480, and have a logical bit marking whether the content is DAR 16:9 or DAR 4:3...

Oh, but you're referring to the extra bonus letterboxing for 12:5 content. Yeah, that does appear to be baked in.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group