The actual:NewRisingSun wrote:On the subject of NES 2.0 vs. UNIF: I'm planning to make a post about assigning NES 2.0 mapper numbers (256+ for non-Chinese/512+ for Chinese) for all those boards that so far are UNIF-only. For that purpose, I will also post a UNIF->NES 2.0 converter.
NES 2.0 has 4095*15 mapper numbers,is Very do meet the requirements.zxbdragon wrote:Nes 2.0 is very bad, so its use is not recommended. nes 2.0 submapper have 15. 255 * 15 mapper number,is Very don't meet the requirements.
main mapper 255(At least the nes is 2.0 )
sub mapper 15 (sub mapper max 15)
4096 is next version.
If the same main MAPPER,but submapper information completely different, nes 2.0 very chicken ribs.
unif After the completion of can reach the PRAM, CRAM (SIZE, SAVE) .
nes 2.0 use ines header,Limited, impossible to 4096 * 15
7 0
---------
SSSS MMMM
S: Submapper number. Mappers not using submappers set this to zero.
M: Bits 11-8 of mapper number.
MMMM 1111 is 4096?
Nes 2.0 is the most chicken ribs, and one of the most chaotic mapper management solution