It is currently Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:30 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours



Forum rules


Related:



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 252 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:09 am
Posts: 8
Guspaz wrote:

240p is part of the HDMI spec.


It is now but it is not a feature supported by the Super Nt. The Super Nt only does 480p, 720p, and 1080p, per their website


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 6:56 pm
Posts: 28
Location: Montréal
panzeroceania wrote:
Guspaz wrote:

240p is part of the HDMI spec.


It is now but it is not a feature supported by the Super Nt. The Super Nt only does 480p, 720p, and 1080p, per their website


Analogue is at least aware that there is a desire for it: I tweeted the request for 240p HDMI at them, and they liked it. Doesn't mean they'll do it, but they're at least aware.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:54 pm
Posts: 4
Hi.

@jwdonal, what say ye about helping ikari implementing SuperFX and SA-1 on the SD2SNES?
You have the talent and already know how the main snes CPU works and have the code in FPGA form.

Sorry about hijacking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:05 pm
Posts: 713
Location: New Mexico, USA
James-F wrote:
what say ye about helping ikari implementing SuperFX and SA-1 on the SD2SNES?
Would love to. I think it makes a lot of sense, most especially if the VeriSNES is open-sourced.

James-F wrote:
Sorry about hijacking.
I don't think asking about other potential applications for the VeriSNES on the VeriSNES thread is hijacking... ;)

--
Using this thread to talk about the Super Nt however is - so let's tighten it up people! Lol :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:54 pm
Posts: 4
This is fantastic to hear that you have the will to do it, this will be quite huge improvement to the value of sd2snes.
If you can/will please contact him directly, I certainly don't want to be a middle man in such grandiose historical events if they happen. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:18 pm
Posts: 32
It seems to be a bit unpleasant to find out Super Nt is released...
However the fact that the both are useless fakes soothes the pain.

The battle of fakes is coming: who will be more similar to the Original?

It could be an exact hardware copy of the original but who needs it? Everyone needs a fake. Sad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:54 pm
Posts: 4
FPGA based clones are more real than the official Snes mini.
Besides, the original hardware from the 90s is not eternal but FPGA code, IS.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:09 am
Posts: 501
Location: Indianapolis
greatkreator wrote:
It seems to be a bit unpleasant to find out Super Nt is released...
However the fact that the both are useless fakes soothes the pain.

The battle of fakes is coming: who will be more similar to the Original?

It could be an exact hardware copy of the original but who needs it? Everyone needs a fake. Sad.


People got new TVs since 1992 and want a system that works on a contemporary flat panel display. Scaling options exist but they tend to be fairly expensive and add lag.

_________________
/* this is a comment */


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:18 pm
Posts: 32
Snes mini is just a disgusting and deeply disappointing piece of cr..
Of course it will be absolutely ok for the majority of casual players that would like to get a bit of retro enjoyment.
But why Nintendo did release that?!... Please unrelease it back.
Create the same cool console as it was in the past but brand new + a good audio-video output + (would be really cool but not required: wireless gamepads). That's it. Profit.
Nobody told Nintendo that we already could play that cr.. without Nintendo and their "genius" invention Snes Mini very well.

If not a secret what's wrong with contemporary flat panel displays + the original console? The composite output?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Posts: 10117
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
greatkreator wrote:
If not a secret what's wrong with contemporary flat panel displays + the original console? The composite output?

The way modern TVs interpret 240p composite signals sucks balls, because of interlacing issues, mostly. That is, if they even support composite video anymore... Analog connections are already being abandoned by TV manufacturers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:49 am
Posts: 206
Location: NYC
Yes, the low resolution composite output. Most modern LCD TVs are quite poor at upscaling 240p video.

Also: it'd be great if Nintendo reissued "real" SNESs but that's just not going to happen. There just isn't a big enough market for original carts, and throwing a Linux emulator on an ARM SoC like in the SNES Mini is way way cheaper than manufacturing custom chips. So the only "real thing" we have is 20+ year old hardware that's starting to fail irreparably.

And what's the real thing anyway? The original 1/1/1 SNES? Do 1CHIPs count? SNES Jr's?

It's entirely possible that the VeriSNES/Super NT's behaviour might be closer to the 1/1/1 SNES than some later official Nintendo models. Would that make them more or less fake than an SNES Jr. that can't run Pocky & Rocky?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:01 pm
Posts: 233
Location: Nanaimo, BC Canada
If an FPGA clone was based on a 1-Chip SNES would it then have a sharper picture than that of one based on the original 2 chip version?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Posts: 19245
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
The 1CHIP's sharper output is a result of an improved DAC (digital to analog converter) in the PPU. The DAC quality is theoretically independent of the accuracy of the S-CPU and S-PPU logic that precedes it. The silicon is fast enough nowadays that an FPGA Super NES could look as sharp as the 1CHIP even if its logic is based on that of pre-1CHIP revisions like the 1/1/1 or 2/1/3.

But DAC quality really only matters on a device that outputs 240p/480i composite, S-Video, RGB, or YPbPr, or 480p RGB or YPbPr through a line doubler. Something that outputs only HDMI needs no DAC at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:54 pm
Posts: 4
adam_smasher wrote:
Would that make them more or less fake than an SNES Jr. that can't run Pocky & Rocky?

Pocky and Rockey, and Super Ghouls and Ghosts, both are bugs of SD2SNES where it didn't reset some DMA address like a when switching a real cartridge which requires a full power cycle.
It has been fixed in version 1.7 from April 2016.

There are indeed minor bugs and glitches with the 1Chip consoles... like an emulator. :shock:
The 1Chip is just an integrated snes on a chip, much like the new wave of snes-on-fpga are, and snes-on-fpga's have the benefit and potential to be 100% accurate to whatever revision of the real hardware the programmer chooses and firmware updated.
Moreover, adding analog video outputs is also an option.

Anyway, it is great to see jwdonal advancing with his open source VeriSNES.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:49 am
Posts: 206
Location: NYC
I have neither of those games so I'm just writing from hearsay, but if you google around people report issues with original carts not working on 1CHIPs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 252 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group