Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

You can talk about almost anything that you want to on this board.

Moderator: Moderators

tepples
Posts: 21973
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: NE Indiana, USA (NTSC)
Contact:

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by tepples » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:01 pm

tokumaru wrote:Another thing I can't stand is when games have a lot of movies, cutscenes, or other kinds of non-interactive sections. Tutorial levels that try to teach you a billion commands and give you tons of instructions before you can get to the actual game are also incredibly annoying.
What's the alternative when a game's mechanics genuinely aren't discoverable, such as those of Tetrisphere where an A press will cost you one of your three lives unless the cursor is in the right place, and you are unlikely to be able to tell what the right place is unless you know the rules of the game? Not all games come with printed manuals, especially if purchased used.

User avatar
tokumaru
Posts: 11692
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by tokumaru » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:18 pm

Bregalad wrote:In my family I am the younger bro, so I'm definitely not going to learn anything about newer games by visiting my eldest bro
Well, my brother is 3 years younger than me, and we liked the same games as kids, but I stopped caring at some point (around the early 2000's), while he kept going. It could've been the other way around, so I don't see why the older brother can't be more into games than the younger one.
This is hardly new
This is hardly new
True, but these were some of the things that drove me away from gaming, and AFAIK are still very common.
I'm pretty sure on side of that there has always been games with cartoonish look, or has it disapeared ?
Sure, and those are usually the ones that can make me mildly interested in newer games, but not enough to justify the purchase of a modern console or gaming PC.

I also greatly dislike how everything is temporary these days... Consoles don't last, everything is a download and relies on companies providing the services you need in order to play the games you "own" (downloads, servers, DRM, etc.).

This year I had my first experience with Steam, because of Sonic Mania. Being the classic Sonic fan that I am, I couldn't miss the opportunity of playing the genuine sequel to Sonic & Knuckles, so I had to play by the modern rules. The game was cool and all, but the modern aspects of the experience really put me off, like not having a physical copy of the game (meaning I have to rely on Steam not closing down if I want to own the game forever) and those obnoxious achievements notifications.

User avatar
tokumaru
Posts: 11692
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by tokumaru » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:26 pm

tepples wrote:What's the alternative when a game's mechanics genuinely aren't discoverable
I tend to not like games that have undiscoverable machanics to begin with, so I can't really think of any alternatives. I like games that teach you through actual gameplay, implicitly... If that's not possible, I probably won't like the game anyway.

adam_smasher
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:49 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by adam_smasher » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:27 pm

With clever and thoughtful design you can usually communicate rules intuitively and non-verbally.

In your specific example of Tetrisphere, maybe have the first level not give the player any option - let there be only one place to put the piece. That would communicate what a correct placement of the piece looks like without the player risking failure. Then make the next level give the player two or three options, with one obviously correct. The player will then get to reinforce their intuition about what the rule is and feel a sense of accomplishment. Alternatively, they'll realize they didn't properly grasp the rule the first time around and try again; once they pick the correct spot, they'll (hopefully) see the pattern by comparison with the first level, and will then have the rule down pat.

Some good "reading": The Witness, The Design of Everyday Things, Anna Anthropy on SMB, Sequelitis on Mega Man X.

I don't mean to imply that tutorials can (or should) be avoided at all times. But lots of modern games are way too obtrusive about it. They should be a last resort, I think.

User avatar
tokumaru
Posts: 11692
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by tokumaru » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:29 pm

adam_smasher wrote:Sequelitis on Mega Man X
This is like, one of my favorite videos, ever.

User avatar
gauauu
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:21 pm
Location: Central Illinois, USA
Contact:

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by gauauu » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:39 pm

tepples wrote:
tokumaru wrote:Another thing I can't stand is when games have a lot of movies, cutscenes, or other kinds of non-interactive sections. Tutorial levels that try to teach you a billion commands and give you tons of instructions before you can get to the actual game are also incredibly annoying.
What's the alternative when a game's mechanics genuinely aren't discoverable, such as those of Tetrisphere where an A press will cost you one of your three lives unless the cursor is in the right place, and you are unlikely to be able to tell what the right place is unless you know the rules of the game? Not all games come with printed manuals, especially if purchased used.
Maybe I'm just an old curmudgeon, but I still think a manual is the right place to communicate a lot of this stuff. Some games end up with really boring intro levels as they try to teach you the mechanics (either by tutorial, which is terrible, or really boring "learn by doing" levels), when it could be taught perfectly well with a few pages of manual text.

I realize there was a period of time when rentals were very popular, before the internet was popular, when it was common to end up with a game and no manual. But now we don't need to worry about it -- the internet is ubiquitous enough to assume that if you managed to get your hands on a game and a system to play it, you probably have a way to download a manual. Plus the manual gives you something fun to look at when you're not playing the game.

User avatar
rainwarrior
Posts: 7812
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:03 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by rainwarrior » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:49 pm

Bregalad wrote:Well the trend to have graphics more and more realistic is inevitable, but I'm pretty sure on side of that there has always been games with cartoonish look, or has it disapeared ?
I feel there's more variety in games than ever before, partly because there's so much happening at a lower budget scale right now.

For every "AAA" game spending tons of money and trying not to stick their neck out, there's about 1000 indie games trying something weird. Most of them will fail, but a few of them are really good! For the last several years I've been much more interested in this area of modern games than the big budget ones.

There's tons of games coming out now that don't have overt annoying tutorials, or cutscenes, or aren't about a violent premise etc. if that's what you want, and tons that do as well; there's a pretty wide spectrum here.

Celius
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Contact:

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by Celius » Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:37 pm

I feel like big budget games like I do about big budget movies. I just feel like every movie/game is getting shoved down my throat as "the most epic event of all time ever". In the end, I so don't care, and I resent the idea that I'm feeding some giant corporation by being lured into the hype. No thank you. We all know that the next movie/game will be followed up by something even more "epic", so what is even the point.
Well the trend to have graphics more and more realistic is inevitable, but I'm pretty sure on side of that there has always been games with cartoonish look, or has it disapeared ?
There are still plenty of games with unrealistic graphics, but I tend to be visually impaired by ones that are super realistic. There is too much detail to look at, it often makes it difficult to distinguish in-game objects from the level map. Suddenly, I get hit with some tiny bullet that I could barely see because the post-apocalyptic piles of rubble everywhere are so detailed, my eyes don't know where to focus.

Pokun
Posts: 1447
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 5:49 am
Location: Hokkaido, Japan

Re: Consoles that require the internet vs ones that don't

Post by Pokun » Fri Dec 22, 2017 6:59 pm

Well if graphical detail gets in the way of gameplay it's a design fault, not that you aren't used to modern graphics.

I'm with Rainwarrior though, all kinds of games still exists, although some genres may have almost died out or are only represented in the form of minigames or cheap download-exclusive games due to their simple nature (e.g. maze games like Pacman or Heiankyou Alien, or text-based adventures etc). But because there's so much to choose between nowadays it's just so much harder to keep yourself up to date. Especially considering a lot of us now are full-time working adults and don't have as much time as we used to have as kids. If you don't keep up it's very easy to get blinded by the big AAA titles and other hyped stuff and think it's the only things out there nowadays.

Post Reply