Okay well I'm going to go ahead and announce the release. Feel free to point out any corrections that need made, but the only potential significant danger I was concerned about was if there were complaints on pricing. But the past 6 months has given more than enough time for comments as I went with my proposed pricing from my
Feb post.
tepples wrote:
None of the entries this time were GPL that I'm aware of, but I'll go through all the entries this weekend to see if the source code for any of them is available.
Okay well either way, I consider you the resident expert when it comes to license requirements. Let me know the conclusion here and I'll adjust the webpage accordingly.
tepples wrote:
Aren't those "RHDE" and "editor" and "Helmet" and "NintendoAge"?
Yes, sorry I copied that from my scratch notes, nothing official coming from there anyway.
43110 wrote:
So this is actually the first time I get to see my work printed out, looks nice.
Yeah they turned out pretty good. Honestly I don't get all the complex file types, I asked the print shop if they had a preferred format and they said whatever I've sent thus far worked fine. I've never dealt with svg. I do recall them having issues with the label for some reason and I quick found a means to convert it to bmp. But looking at the files I sent, I'm pretty sure they converted from .svg themselves as my files don't have the thin lines. Future recommendation I would say use a format that isn't subject to interpretation .png or .bmp is prob best.